Phase 2recruiting

Pumitamig for previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic colorectal cancer

Bristol-Myers Squibb· ROSETTA CRC-203

Reviewed by Blane Jackson, DDS, MBA. Educational analysis only. Read the editorial policy and disclosures.

NCT07221357 on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Study type

interventional

Design

Randomized, double-blind, phas…

Target enrollment

990

Est. completion

2030-02-02

Investor scorecard

Probability of success

low

Timeline to catalyst

The trial started in late 2025 and is expected to complete by 2030. The phase 2 portion may have an interim analysis around 2027-2028, which could provide an early signal of efficacy. If the phase 2 results are positive, the trial may proceed to phase 3, with final results expected around 2030. Investors should watch for press releases on phase 2 data or interim analyses.

Potential stock impact

Significant

The probability of success is low because immunotherapy has historically failed in the majority of colorectal cancer patients (MSS). Pumitamig is a novel bispecific antibody, but there is no prior clinical data in colorectal cancer, and the trial is large and long. The comparator (bevacizumab + chemo) is an effective standard, so pumitamig must show a clear improvement. Given the high failure rate of drugs in phase 2/3 trials for solid tumors, especially in this indication, the probability of success is estimated at around 15-20%.


What is being tested?

This trial is testing a new drug called pumitamig, which is a type of immunotherapy that helps the immune system fight cancer. It is being tested in patients with colorectal cancer that has spread (metastatic) or cannot be removed by surgery. The drug is given together with standard chemotherapy (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or CAPOX). The goal is to see if pumitamig plus chemotherapy works better than the current standard of care, which is bevacizumab (a drug that blocks blood vessel growth to tumors) plus the same chemotherapy options.

How does the trial work?

This is a randomized, double-blind trial, meaning patients are assigned by chance to receive either pumitamig or bevacizumab, and neither the patient nor the doctor knows which one they are getting. The trial has two phases: phase 2 will first determine the best dose of pumitamig and get an early read on efficacy, then phase 3 will confirm if it is better than the standard. Patients will receive treatment in cycles, typically every two or three weeks, and will be monitored with imaging scans and blood tests. They will continue treatment as long as they are benefiting and side effects are manageable. The trial is expected to enroll 990 patients at multiple sites worldwide.

What does success look like?

Success would be if pumitamig plus chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes compared to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. The main measures are: 1) Objective response rate (ORR) – the percentage of patients whose tumors shrink or disappear. For colorectal cancer, an ORR of around 40-50% is typical with current treatments, so a higher ORR would be promising. 2) Progression-free survival (PFS) – the time patients live without the cancer growing. Current first-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer have a median PFS of about 10-12 months, so a meaningful improvement (e.g., 2-3 months) would be considered a win. 3) Overall survival (OS) – the ultimate goal, with current median OS around 30 months. A significant improvement in OS would be the strongest evidence of benefit.

What it means for investors

For investors, this trial is a major catalyst for Bristol-Myers Squibb. If the phase 2 portion shows a clear signal of improved efficacy and a manageable safety profile, it could boost confidence and potentially lead to accelerated development. Positive phase 3 results would likely lead to regulatory submissions and eventual approval, opening a significant market opportunity in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer, which is a large patient population. However, the trial is long (expected completion in 2030), so near-term catalysts are limited to interim analyses and phase 2 data readouts. If the trial fails, it would be a setback for BMS's pipeline, but the company has other assets to mitigate the impact. The stock impact could be significant if results are positive, but given the long timeline, it may be more of a slow-burn catalyst.


Trial endpoints

Primary endpoints

Objective response rate (ORR): the percentage of patients whose tumors shrink or disappear (confirmed complete or partial response) as assessed by standard criteria (RECIST v1.1) by the investigator.
Progression-free survival (PFS): the length of time during and after treatment that patients live without the cancer growing or spreading, as assessed by a blinded independent review committee.
Overall survival (OS): the length of time from randomization until death from any cause.

Secondary endpoints

Progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by the investigator (not just the independent review).
Duration of response (DOR): how long a tumor response lasts before the cancer starts growing again.
Time to response (TTR): how quickly after starting treatment a tumor response occurs.
Disease control rate (DCR): the percentage of patients who achieve a complete response, partial response, or stable disease for a certain period.
Recommended dose of pumitamig for the phase 3 portion of the study.

Comparator

Bevacizumab (Avastin) in combination with chemotherapy (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or CAPOX)


Competitive landscape

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, with over 1.9 million new cases annually. In the metastatic setting, first-line treatment typically involves chemotherapy plus a targeted agent like bevacizumab or an EGFR inhibitor (if RAS wild-type). The market for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer is substantial, with global sales of bevacizumab (Avastin) exceeding $7 billion at its peak. Newer immunotherapies have shown limited efficacy in the majority of colorectal cancers (microsatellite stable), so there is a high unmet need for treatments that work in this population. If pumitamig can demonstrate improved outcomes over bevacizumab, it could capture a significant share of this multi-billion dollar market.

DrugSponsorPhaseDifferentiation
encorafenib + cetuximab (Braftovi + Erbitux)Pfizer / Merck KGaAPhase 1Targets BRAF V600E-mutant colorectal cancer, a specific subset, not all patients.
trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu)Daiichi Sankyo / AstraZenecaPhase 1For HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer, another biomarker-driven subset.
fruquintinib (Fruzaqla)TakedaPhase 1Approved for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer, not first-line.
botensilimab + balstilimabAgenusPhase 1Combination of two immunotherapies (anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1) being tested in colorectal cancer, including microsatellite stable tumors.
etigilimab (anti-TIGIT)CompugenPhase 1Another immunotherapy targeting TIGIT, being tested in combination with PD-1 inhibitors in colorectal cancer.

Historical context

Prior trial results

Pumitamig is a bispecific antibody that targets both CD3 on T cells and a tumor-associated antigen (likely DLL3 or similar, but not specified). It has been studied in earlier-phase trials for other solid tumors, showing manageable safety and preliminary antitumor activity. However, no prior results in colorectal cancer have been reported publicly. This is the first trial in colorectal cancer, so there is no prior efficacy data in this indication.

Regulatory history

No regulatory designations (e.g., fast track, breakthrough) have been announced for pumitamig in colorectal cancer. The drug is still in early development, and this trial is a phase 2/3, which may allow for accelerated approval if phase 2 results are compelling.

Similar drug precedents

Immunotherapies like PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have revolutionized treatment for many cancers, but in colorectal cancer, they are only effective in the small subset (about 5%) with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors. For the majority (microsatellite stable, MSS), checkpoint inhibitors have failed to show benefit. Bispecific T-cell engagers (like blinatumomab) have shown success in hematologic malignancies but have been challenging in solid tumors due to toxicity and limited tumor penetration. However, newer formats like pumitamig are designed to overcome some of these hurdles. If pumitamig can show activity in MSS colorectal cancer, it would be a major breakthrough.

Disclaimer: This page is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell securities. Clinical trial analysis reflects publicly available data and AI-generated interpretations. Biotech investing carries significant risk including potential total loss of investment. Always verify critical claims through primary sources and consult a qualified financial advisor. Some links on this page are affiliate links. Review our editorial policy and disclosures.